“Why is it that in a society with a Puritan heritage we have such completely ambivalent feelings about Work? We feel guilty, do we not, if not busy? But we feel somewhat soiled, on the other hand, if we sweat overmuch?
I can only suggest that we often indulge in made work, in false business, to keep from being bored. Or worse still we conceive the idea of working for money. The money becomes the object, the target, the end-all and be-all. Thus work, being important only as a means to that end, degenerates into boredom. Can we wonder then that we hate it so? Nothing could be further from true creativity.”
I recently attended a Dreamforce session titled “The 9 Principles of Innovation at Google” and wanted to share my notes.
Innovation comes from everywhere.
There is no innovation department at Google. Kallayil shared an example where their algorithm was working with unintended consequences in that searches for “best ways to commit suicide” did in fact list what if felt the best results were. A medical doctor at Google argued persuasively that although the algorithm may have decided to provide results, Google needed to intervene with human-powered result by providing the 800 number to the suicide prevention hotline. If you now Google anything suicide-related you receive the 800 number for the suicide hotline as the top result. The day the change was made the volume of calls to the hotline went up by 9%.
Focus on the user and all else will follow.
Provided an example of implementing instant search which saves the user a few microseconds. Executives knew receiving faster results would minimize the amount of time ads were displayed but they went ahead and implemented it because it made for a better user experience. Also mentioned that although each user is only saving a few microseconds, when you factor the billions of searches a year, it saves the world an immense amount of time at scale. Implementing instant search was also more costly to implement but again it was best for user experience and therefore implemented.
Think 10x (ten times) better.
This is Larry Page’s mantra. If you want radical revolution at a scale, think of things as 10x and not 10%. Provided the example of Google Books. When Google’s mission was created to “organize the world’s information and make it universally accessible and useful” it wasn’t to just organize digital information. At the time when Google Books was created as a goal, most of the world’s information was primarily still analog.
Bet on technical insights.
Google engineers developed a self-driving car as an example. A few engineers read that a couple million accidents car accidents happen a year and felt compelled as engineers to see what they could do to reduce or eliminate those deaths. They thought if you remove the human it could reduce or eliminate the accidents. They already had services like Google Earth and Maps at their disposal.
Ship/launch and iterate.
Some organizations only ship products when they are polished or fully ready. At Google, they believe they should develop a first prototype, get feedback, and then based on that feedback iterate to make it better. Gmail is a perfect example as it was in beta for 3 years. Fast is better than slow. The first prototype of Google Glass was developed in 90 minutes
Give employees 20 percent time.
Give people freedom in their regular schedule, even when outside of the core job, and they will delight you with what they come up with quite often. They actually didn’t come up with the idea, they borrowed it with what some universities do. The way it works is you quickly build a prototype and you recruit others to help you with that idea inside of the company. Gmail, Google News, Google Alerts are all products that came out with the 20% rule. A street view engineer was on vacation in Paris and was frustrated that the hotel he was staying at wasn’t visible because it was down a narrow alley so he created a trike with the camera mounted to it so he could capture the images. You can now see parts of the Galapagos ocean in street view if you Google that as well.
Default to open.
Google admits they can’t hire all the “smart” people in the world. They believe if you open up your application to the world you can allow them to help you make their products even better. A perfect example is Google Maps. They empower people to help them via Google Map Maker to update the maps because the world’s infrastructure is constantly changing each day.
There is no stigma attached to failure at Google. “There is a belief in the company that if you don’t fail often enough, you’re not trying hard enough.” He says “failure is actually a badge of honor.” Since Larry Page has taken over he has shut down 72 products so they try many things and shut then shut that service down if it doesn’t end up working.
Have a mission that matters.
If you ask people at Google why they come into the work many will say that their work is helping to change humanity (the world). They are working to level the playing field for information retrieval.
“Compliance is simple to measure, simple to test for and simple to teach. Punish non-compliance, reward obedience and repeat.
Initiative is very difficult to teach to 28 students in a quiet classroom. It’s difficult to brag about in a school board meeting. And it’s a huge pain in the neck to do reliably.
Schools like teaching compliance. They’re pretty good at it.
To top it off, until recently the customers of a school or training program (the companies that hire workers) were buying compliance by the bushel. Initiative was a red flag, not an asset.
Of course, now that’s all changed. The economy has rewritten the rules, and smart organizations seek out intelligent problem solvers. Everything is different now. Expect the part about how much easier it is to teach compliance.”
“When you charge by the hour, you and your client begin your relationship with diametrically opposed desires. You want to bill more hours, they want you to bill fewer hours. That is a sucky place to start a relationship” – Jason Blumer, Pricing Strategices for Creatives (read more)
Two studies that call into question the ideas that:
-- If you reward something do you get more of the behavior you want?
-- If you punish someone you get less of the behavior you want.
As long as the task involved used only a mechanical skill the bonuses worked as expected. Higher pay = better performance. That makes sense.
Once the task called for rudimentary cognitive skill the larger the reward led to poorer performance.
For simple, straightforward tasks reward mechanisms work great.
When a task gets more complicated, it requires some conceptual, creative thinking, those types of motivators don’t work.
Fact. Money is a motivator. If you don’t pay enough, people won’t be motivated.
Pay people enough to take the issue of money off the table. So pay people enough to take money off the table so they aren’t thinking about money, but rather the task/work at hand.
3 factors lead to better performance & personal satisfaction…
-- Autonomy (the desire to be self directed).
-- Mastery (mastery is the urge to get better at stuff).
-- Purpose. More and more organizations want a transcendent purpose.
Traditional notions of management run foul of this. Management is great if you want compliance but if you want engagement, self-directed is better.
When the profit motive gets unmoored from the purpose motive, bad things happen.
Skype: Our goal is to be disruptive but in the cause of making the world a better place.
Steve Jobs: I want to put a ding in the universe.
We are purpose maximizers, not profit maximizers. We care about mastery very deeply and we want to be self-directed.