Outta My Way I’m Going To Starbucks!

Brand Passion

When Customers Become Walking Advertisements

Starbucks license plate frame Outta my way license plate frame

I was at a Starbucks drive-through when I noticed the license plate frame of the car in front of me. The license plate read “Outta my way, I’m going to Starbucks!”. The reason I took the picture was it was interesting to me that I was in a long line of cars for a $4 latte and the car directly in front of me loved the company so much they proudly displayed it on their license plate.

What does it say about a company when people (not companies) make and sell license plates which allow you to display your affection for a particular company?

I don’t think it is too difficult to create a company people will love and respect so much they will tell the world about it. Companies of course try to attract customers to get them in their door, but are some companies simply looking to get customers in the building, or are they looking to build relationships with their customers?

I think you can build a relationship with your customers through your brand, transparency, serving the community it serves, customer service, quality products, and differentiating products. I think if you do any of those things to a high standard (not too difficult these days) customers will come back, and they may even be so passionate about your company they will tout it on their license plate.

The Recipe for Brand Loyalty

Brand Identity

Strong, recognizable, and meaningful

Transparency

Honest communication with customers

Community

Serving the local neighborhoods

Customer Service

Going above and beyond expectations

Quality Products

Consistent excellence every time

Differentiation

Standing out from competitors

Your Recipe for Success?

Is there a recipe for the success of a company? If you were to make the perfect recipe for a company you love so much you wanted to share it with the world, what would it consist of in your opinion?

Join the Conversation

What brands have you felt so passionately about that you’ve promoted them beyond just being a customer? What did those companies do to earn that loyalty?

Double Your Productivity Without More Work Or Stress

The Productivity Paradox

Why 37x More Productive Is Impossible

Zappos Love

Zappos COO Alfred Lin enlightens us on how to become 37 times more productive in only one year! Can it be? Let’s hear him out:

“…Being 37x more productive is impossible, and I’ll show you why. But along the way, it will become clear how becoming 2-3x more productive might be within reach.

His math isn’t the problem per se. It’s true that if you improve 1% each day over the previous day, that’s a 1% compounding rate. My question is: Is it possible to increase your daily productivity by an entire percent every day?

To answer that, I want to give you a fun math puzzle. Yeah, I know, “fun” is relative… Okay look, if you don’t like word problems just take a random guess at the answer. If you’re up for the challenge, try to solve it without pen and paper. You know, just to prove your MIT education wasn’t for nothing.

The Math Puzzle

Here’s the puzzle: You get in your car at home and head out towards your mother’s house 60 miles away. (Your mom likes this word problem, I can already tell.) You hit traffic during the first half of the trip, so after 30 miles you’ve averaged only 30 miles per hour.

How fast do you have to go during the second half of the trip such that you’ve averaged 60 mph over the entire trip?

If you’re not using pen and paper, maybe you guessed 90? 120?

The Answer: It’s Impossible

Actually it’s impossible! To average 60 mph, you need to travel the whole 60 miles in a single hour. But it’s already been an hour! Even if you went 1000 mph during the second half, it would have taken just over an hour to complete the 60 miles, therefore your average is still less than 60 mph.

It’s amazing how periods of low velocity wash away gains of high velocity.

In the puzzle, if you doubled your speed in the second half, it would increase your trip average from 30 to 40 mph. If you quadrupled your speed in the second half, your trip average would still be only 48 mph.

Once you’re behind, you can’t make up ground, no matter how fast you go.

Consistency Matters

Small, consistent improvements beat sporadic bursts of productivity

Lost Time Is Gone

You can’t make up for periods of low productivity, no matter how fast you go later

Realistic Goals

Aim for 2-3x improvements rather than impossible targets

Your Thoughts?

How does this productivity paradox apply to your work? What realistic improvements have you been able to make in your own productivity?

Tony Hsieh: On a Scale of 1 to 10, How Weird Are You?

Tony Hsieh on Building Zappos

The Power of Company Culture

This is a great article on how the founder/CEO of Zappos.com learned how important it is for companies to focus on culture and choosing the right employees for their company. If you have time, the very first question and answer is my favorite, so be sure and read that one if you can.

Tony Hsieh is the chief executive of Zappos.com, and this interview was conducted by Adam Bryant. Below are some of my favorite questions:

What are some of the most important leadership lessons you’ve learned?

After college, a roommate and I started a company called LinkExchange in 1996, and it grew to about 100 or so people, and then we ended up selling the company to Microsoft in 1998. From the outside, it looked like it was a great acquisition, $265 million, but most people don’t know the real reason why we ended up selling the company.

It was because the company culture just went completely downhill. When it was starting out, when it was just 5 or 10 of us, it was like your typical dot-com. We were all really excited, working around the clock, sleeping under our desks, had no idea what day of the week it was. But we didn’t know any better and didn’t pay attention to company culture.

By the time we got to 100 people, even though we hired people with the right skill sets and experiences, I just dreaded getting out of bed in the morning and was hitting that snooze button over and over again.

Why?

I just didn’t look forward to going to the office. The passion and excitement were no longer there. That’s kind of a weird feeling for me because this was a company I co-founded, and if I was feeling that way, how must the other employees feel? That’s actually why we ended up selling the company.

Financially, it meant I didn’t have to work again if I didn’t want to. So that was the lens through which I was looking at things. It’s basically asking the question, what would you want to do if you won the lottery? For me, I didn’t want to be part of a company where I dreaded going into the office.

So when I joined Zappos about a year later, I wanted to make sure that I didn’t make the same mistake that I had made at LinkExchange, in terms of the company culture going downhill. So for us, at Zappos, we really view culture as our No. 1 priority. We decided that if we get the culture right, most of the stuff, like building a brand around delivering the very best customer service, will just take care of itself.

So how do you do that?

About five years ago, we formalized the definition of our culture into 10 core values. We wanted to come up with committable core values, meaning that we would actually be willing to hire and fire people based on those values, regardless of their individual job performance. Given that criteria, it’s actually pretty tough to come up with core values.

Tell me what happened.

We spent a year doing that. I basically sent an e-mail out to the entire company, asking them what our values should be, and got a whole bunch of different responses. The initial list was actually 37 long, and then we ended up condensing and combining them and went back and forth and came up with our list of 10.

Today, we actually do two separate sets of interviews. The hiring manager and his or her team will interview for the standard fit within the team, relevant experience, technical ability and so on. But then our H.R. department does a separate set of interviews purely for culture fit. They actually have questions for each and every one of the core values.

Can you give me an example of the value and the question?

Well, some of them are behavioral questions. One of our values is, “Create fun and a little weirdness.” So one of our interview questions is, literally, on a scale of 1 to 10, how weird are you? If you’re a 1, you’re probably a little bit too strait-laced for us. If you’re a 10, you might be too psychotic for us.

It’s not so much the number; it’s more seeing how candidates react to a question. Because our whole belief is that everyone is a little weird somehow, so it’s really more just a fun way of saying that we really recognize and celebrate each person’s individuality, and we want their true personalities to shine in the workplace environment, whether it’s with co-workers or when talking with customers.

I think of myself less as a leader, and more of being almost an architect of an environment that enables employees to come up with their own ideas, and where employees can grow the culture and evolve it over time, so it’s not me having a vision of “This is our culture.”

Maybe an analogy is, if you think of the employees and culture as plants growing, I’m not trying to be the biggest plant for them to aspire to. I’m more trying to architect the greenhouse where they can all flourish and grow.

Did the process of developing those core values go smoothly?

Honestly, there was a lot of resistance to the core values rolling out, including from me. I was very hesitant, because it just felt like one of those big-company things to do. But within a couple of months, it just made such a huge difference. It gave everyone a common language, and just created a lot more alignment in terms of how everyone in the company was thinking. If I could do it all over again, I would roll out our core values from Day 1.

What other things did you do at Zappos to sort of reinforce and build the culture?

Probably the most important thing I did was try to encourage employees to come up with their own ideas for building the culture. The actual ideas that I’ve personally come up with are few and far between.

But what were those?

For example, for our offices in Las Vegas, it’s a big building. We’ve probably got 700 employees in Vegas. The previous tenants had multiple doors where you can exit, and the parking lot is in the back. We made the decision to actually lock all the doors, so everyone has to go through the front-entrance reception area, even though that means you might have to walk all the way around the building. The reason for that is to create this kind of central hub that everyone has to pass through to help build community and culture.

And the free lunch we provide for employees is really meant less as a benefit in terms of a free lunch, and more to get employees to interact with each other. But most of the stuff that happens in our office is really about some employee coming up with an idea and, whether it’s me or other managers, saying, “If you’re passionate about it, just run with it.”

At some point, it kind of just snowballs, because once employees see other employees just doing stuff, then that lets them feel like they have more permission to run with their ideas.

If you’re hiring a senior executive, reporting directly to you, what kind of questions would you be asking them?

It’s pretty hard to interview senior executives, because they’re in that position for a reason. They do many interviews themselves. It’s hard to tell from an interview. So I’m not sure there’s that much you can get out of the in-office interview. They need the relevant skill set and experience and so on. But far more important is, are they going to be good for the culture? Is this someone we would choose to have dinner or drinks with, even if they weren’t working for Zappos?

Hiring senior-level talent is very hard, it’s hit or miss, and they can do a lot of damage to the culture. We’ve had bad experiences with that. So we have this thing called the pipeline, which is our vision for how we want to grow as a company. We’re hoping five years from now the vast, vast majority of all hires will actually be entry-level, but we’ll provide all the training and mentorship so that, over a five- to seven-year period, they can become a senior leader within the company. That will help protect our culture and also give all the employees a growth path professionally.

If you could ask only one or two questions to get a sense of a person, what would they be?

“If you had to name something, what would you say is the biggest misperception that people have of you?” Then the follow-up question I usually ask is, “What’s the difference between misperception and perception?” After all, perception is perception.

What are you trying to discover with those questions?

I think it’s a combination of how self-aware people are and how honest they are. I think if someone is self-aware, then they can always continue to grow. If they’re not self-aware, I think it’s harder for them to evolve or adapt beyond who they already are.

Zappos.com’s 10 Core Values

  1. Deliver WOW Through Service
  2. Embrace and Drive Change
  3. Create Fun and A Little Weirdness
  4. Be Adventurous, Creative, and Open-Minded
  5. Pursue Growth and Learning
  6. Build Open and Honest Relationships With Communication
  7. Build a Positive Team and Family Spirit
  8. Do More With Less
  9. Be Passionate and Determined
  10. Be Humble

Culture First

If you get the culture right, everything else will follow

Hire for Values

Skills matter, but cultural fit is essential

Empower Employees

Be an architect of the environment, not the biggest plant

Join the Conversation

Which of Zappos’ core values resonates most with you? How have you seen company culture affect your own workplace experiences?

Mark Cuban’s Advice on Staying Focused When Young

Mark Cuban’s Advice to College Students

Focus Is Overrated

I have followed Mark’s blog for some time and really liked this post. A college student asked Mark how he remained focused prior to his business success, to which Mark replied with the following:

You are still in school. You don’t need to have all the answers or focus on one thing. You should be trying a lot of things until you find the one thing you really love to do and are good at. When that happens, you will be able to focus.

Being focused at 21 is way over rated. Now is the time to screw up, try as many different things as you can and just maybe figure things out.

The thing you do need to do is learn. Learn accounting. Learn finance. Learn statistics. Learn as much as you can about business. Read biographies about business people. You dont have to focus on 1 thing, but you have to create a base of knowledge so you are ready when its time.

You will never know when that time will come. But you can be ready when it does.

— Mark Cuban

Explore Widely

Try many different things until you find what you love

Build Knowledge

Create a foundation of business understanding

Be Ready

Prepare yourself for when opportunity arrives

What To Learn According to Cuban

Accounting

Finance

Statistics

Business

Biographies

Your Thoughts?

Do you agree with Mark Cuban’s advice? How has exploration versus focused specialization worked in your own life or career?

Article from the New Yorker on John Mackey

John Mackey: The Whole Foods Story

Insights from The New Yorker Profile

John Mackey

John Mackey, the co-founder and chief executive of Whole Foods Market

The New Yorker has a long article on Mackey which was a very good read. Since it is so long, I’ve summarized what I found interesting from it below. I’m terrible at summarizing and in college never got into highlighting my textbooks. When reading I either found it all really interesting or all really dull, so it was either all yellow or remained all white. So, the fact that I have summarized lots of text below should tell you a lot about what I thought of the article.

Key Insights

  • Oversees fifty-four thousand “team members”
  • A year ago, Mackey came across a book called “The Engine 2 Diet,” by an Austin, Texas, firefighter and former professional triathlete named Rip Esselstyn. Basically, you eat plants: you are a rabbit with a skillet. Mackey had been a vegetarian for more than thirty years, and a vegan for five, but the Engine 2 book, among others, helped get him to give up vegetable oils, sugar, and pretty much anything processed. He lost fifteen pounds.
  • Mackey sought succor in spiritual practice. He engaged a friend, a follower of the Czech transpersonal psychologist Stanislav Grof, to guide him through a therapeutic session of holotropic breathing. “I had this very powerful session, very powerful. It lasted about two hours,” Mackey said in an inspirational CD set he released last year called “Passion and Purpose: The Power of Conscious Capitalism.” “I was having a dialogue with what I would define as my deeper self, or my higher self.” He had a pair of epiphanies, one having to do with severed relationships that needed healing. The other was that “if I wanted to continue to do Whole Foods, there couldn’t be any part of my life that was secretive or hidden or that I’d be embarrassed [about] if people found out about it. I had to let go of all of that,” he said. “I’m this public figure now.” He couldn’t “embarrass the company,” he told me. “I have to grow up”—he is fifty-six. “I can’t have affairs with women. One of the things that happened was you have more money and you have more opportunities for such things. And those are sort of off-limits.

In His Own Words

I have my own views, and they’re not necessarily the same as Whole Foods’. People want me to suppress who I am. I guess that’s why so many politicians and C.E.O.s get to be sort of boring because they end up suppressing any individuality to conform to some phony, inauthentic way of being. I’d rather be myself.

I was so viciously attacked for two reasons. One is that people had an idea in their minds about the way Whole Foods was. So when I articulated a capitalistic interpretation of what needed to be done in health care, that was disappointing to some people.

The Early Years

Finding His Path

In high school, Mackey was an indifferent student, a late bloomer, puberty-wise, and a fanatic about basketball, science fiction, and girls. Before his senior year, he was cut from the varsity basketball team, and he persuaded his parents to move so that he could switch schools and play. “That changed my life because for the first time I realized that if you didn’t like the hand you were dealt, you didn’t just have to feel sorry for yourself. You could do something about it.”

College Exploration

He went on to Trinity University, a small school in San Antonio, and the world flowered before him, as it did for so many in those days. “I was reading a lot of philosophy and religion,” he said. “And I did a lot of those experiments that young people do when they’re in college. I’ll not name those.

He quit playing basketball and, for the next several years, went back and forth between Trinity and the University of Texas, in Austin, taking only courses that interested him, and therefore hardly advancing toward a degree. He settled in Austin, in a house of ten or so men. He worked part-time as a dishwasher and spent his nights reading in the library. He had a beard and long bushy hair. Eventually, he moved into a co-ed vegetarian collective. “I had no interest in a vegetarian lifestyle,” he said. “But what I was interested in was alternative lifestyles. And I thought, honestly, that I’d meet a lot of interesting women. And I did.”

Birth of Whole Foods

1978

SaferWay

In 1978, with forty-five thousand dollars from friends and family, he and his girlfriend at the time, Renee Lawson, decided to start a store of their own, which they called SaferWay—a takeoff on Safeway. The store was on the ground floor of a Victorian house; they lived on the third floor and ran a small restaurant on the second—a rustic prototype for today’s prepared-food extravaganzas. The house didn’t have a shower, so they bathed in the store using the hose from a dishwasher, a creation legend that the company holds dear.

1980

First Whole Foods

He soon noticed that a number of much bigger natural-foods stores had sprouted up around the country, such as Mrs. Gooch’s and Frazier Farms, in California. He persuaded Craig Weller and Mark Skiles, the owners of a store called Clarksville Natural Grocery, to merge with him and Lawson (in part, by implying that he might put them out of business), and, in 1980, the four of them opened the first Whole Foods, in a former nightclub. It was ten thousand square feet.

1991

Going Public

After the successful opening of a Chicago store, in 1991, the company went public, and embarked on a company shopping spree.

Management Philosophy

The Auteur CEO

Mackey is an example of what you might call the auteur C.E.O. Like Steve Jobs’s, his personality is entwined in his company’s. He doesn’t bother with day-to-day operations; he’s not a technician or a face man. When he’s asked what it is he does, exactly, he describes a kind of philosopher-king, who brings big ideas to bear.

Fair Compensation

Mackey, an outspoken critic of executive overcompensation, pays himself a dollar a year. No one at the company can have a salary more than nineteen times what the average team member makes. (On average, an S. & P. 500 C.E.O. makes three hundred and nineteen times what a production worker does.)

Competitive Spirit

Mackey is, by all accounts, fiercely competitive. Years ago, the traditional executive-retreat volleyball games had to be scrapped, owing to Mackey’s intensity and his ill-disguised scorn for less capable teammates.

Controversies

Political Views

The health-care op-ed’s headline, “THE WHOLE FOODS ALTERNATIVE TO OBAMACARE,” was the Journals, Mackey says, but the sentiments were his. Mackey’s prescriptions ranged from the obvious (people need to eat better) to the market-minded (promote interstate competition among insurers) to the dreamy (the corporations will take care of us). The gist was that, together, they’d obviate the need for a federal plan, and that the course being pursued by the White House and the Democrats would have disastrous consequences. He led with an epigram attributed to Margaret Thatcher: “The problem with socialism is that eventually you run out of other people’s money.”

Labor Relations

Whole Foods routinely ranks high on those lists of companies that are the best to work for. This view is not shared by unions, which have complained that Mackey prevents unionization among his employees, notably at a store in Madison, Wisconsin, where team members had voted to unionize. Unions have picketed store openings and, as activist investors in Whole Foods stock, have called for Mackey’s firing. In the early eighties, Mackey told a reporter, “The union is like having herpes. It doesn’t kill you, but it’s unpleasant and inconvenient, and it stops a lot of people from becoming your lover.” (That quote, to Mackey’s dismay, won’t go away, either.)

Personal Life

Whole Foods has made Mackey a wealthy man. He owns roughly thirty million dollars in stock—less than one per cent of the company—and has sold millions more over the years. Still, he flies commercial and drives a Honda Civic hybrid. He has houses in Boulder and Austin, and a seven-hundred-and-twenty-acre non-working ranch an hour outside of town, where he and Deborah spend many weekends.

He told me, “If I could, I would wave a magic wand so that Americans ate better because the diseases that are killing us—heart disease, cancer, diabetes, multiple sclerosis, Alzheimer’s—these diseases have a high correlation with diet. And that is something that most people do not understand.”

“But you have a reputation for liking to argue,” I said to Mackey.

“But I don’t like to argue to be right. I like to argue because that’s how I get to the truth. I think dialectically.”

Your Thoughts?

What aspects of John Mackey’s approach to business do you find most interesting or controversial? Do you think his blend of capitalism and idealism is sustainable in today’s market?

The Wisdom of Crowds

The Wisdom of Crowds

How Collective Intelligence Outperforms Individual Expertise

Jelly Beans in a Jar

How many jelly beans are in this jar? The crowd might know better than you do.

I haven’t had a chance to read Wisdom of Crowds yet by James Surowiecki but an article in Building43.com was very interesting. It shows that collectively a crowd/group’s mind is better than your own when trying to solve a problem or answer a question. Check this out…

The Columbia Business School Experiment

In 2007, Michael Mauboussin presented a big jar of jelly beans to his 73 Columbia Business School students. How many beans did they think it contained? Guesses ranged from 250 to 4,100; the actual number was 1,116. The average error was 700 — a massive 62 percent — demonstrating that the students were awful estimators.

Now here comes the weird part. Even with all these wildly incorrect guesses, the average guess was 1,151 — just 3 percent off the mark. Not only that, only 2 of the 73 students guessed better than this group average.

So, although individually everyone was woefully inaccurate, collectively the group was incredibly accurate.

A Proven Phenomenon

Was this a fluke? Hardly. The experiment was made famous in 1987 by Jack Treynor. In his case, it was 850 jelly beans and 56 students. The group estimate was 2.5 percent off; only one student guessed better. The study has been repeated many times since with similar results.

Treynor’s Results (1987)

Actual Count:850 beans
Average Guess:871 beans
Error Margin:2.5%

Visualizing the Phenomenon

Actual: 1,116

Average: 1,151

Individual guesses vary widely (gray dots), but their average (black line) falls remarkably close to the actual value (gold line).

Why This Matters

Decision Making

Group input can lead to better decisions than relying on even the smartest individual.

Market Predictions

This principle helps explain why prediction markets and polling aggregations often work.

Team Dynamics

Diverse teams with varied perspectives may outperform groups of similar experts.

THE
WISDOM
OF CROWDS
JAMES SUROWIECKI

About the Book

In The Wisdom of Crowds, James Surowiecki explores how the aggregation of information in groups results in decisions that are often better than could have been made by any single member of the group.

The book shows that under the right circumstances, groups are remarkably intelligent and often smarter than the smartest individuals within them. This counterintuitive notion challenges our tendency to seek out expert opinions rather than collective wisdom.

Find on Amazon

Your Thoughts?

Have you observed the wisdom of crowds in action? When do you think this principle works best, and when might it fail?

Ways to Foster Innovation

Think Different

Fostering Innovation in Your Organization

Apple Think Different Campaign

Apple’s iconic “Think Different” campaign from 1997

Apple had a famous ad campaign in 1997 asking people to “think different”. How many of you think different? If you find you or your company struggles to think differently, I just reviewed a great list of 50 ways to foster innovation and here are my favorite from the ideachampions.com article:

Innovation Principles

1

Remember that innovation requires no fixed rules or templates — only guiding principles. Creating a more innovative culture is an organic and creative act.

2

Wherever you can, whenever you can, always drive fear out of the workplace. Fear is “Public Enemy #1” of an innovative culture.

3

Have more fun. If you’re not having fun (or at least enjoying the process) something is off.

Challenging Assumptions

4

Always question authority, especially the authority of your own longstanding beliefs.

5

Make new mistakes.

6

As far as the future is concerned, don’t speculate on what might happen, but imagine what you can make happen.

Creating the Right Environment

7

Increase the visual stimuli of your organization’s physical space. Replace gray and white walls with color. Add inspiring photos and art, especially visuals that inspire people to think differently. Reconfigure space whenever possible.

8

Help people broaden their perspective by creating diverse teams and rotating employees into new projects — especially ones they are fascinated by.

9

Ask questions about everything. After asking questions, ask different questions. After asking different questions, ask them in a different way.

10

Ensure a high level of personal freedom and trust. Provide more time for people to pursue new ideas and innovations.

Communication and Failure

11

Encourage everyone to communicate. Provide user-friendly systems to make this happen.

12

Embrace and celebrate failure. 50 to 70 per cent of all new product innovations fail at even the most successful companies. The main difference between companies who succeed at innovation and those who don’t isn’t their rate of success — it’s the fact that successful companies have a LOT of ideas, pilots, and product innovations in the pipeline.

“Here’s to the crazy ones. The misfits. The rebels. The troublemakers. The round pegs in the square holes. The ones who see things differently. They’re not fond of rules. And they have no respect for the status quo. You can quote them, disagree with them, glorify or vilify them. About the only thing you can’t do is ignore them. Because they change things. They push the human race forward. And while some may see them as the crazy ones, we see genius. Because the people who are crazy enough to think they can change the world, are the ones who do.”

— Apple’s “Think Different” campaign (1997)

Applying These Principles

Personal Level

Start by challenging your own assumptions. Set aside time each week for creative thinking. Engage with people outside your normal circles. Embrace small failures as learning opportunities.

Team Level

Create diverse project teams. Set aside time for brainstorming without judgment. Rotate roles occasionally. Celebrate both successes and educational failures.

Organizational Level

Redesign physical spaces to inspire creativity. Create formal and informal channels for idea sharing. Allocate resources for experimental projects. Recognize and reward innovative thinking.

Companies That Think Different

Apple

Revolutionized multiple industries by challenging conventional thinking

Google

Famous 20% time policy allowed employees to pursue passion projects

IDEO

Design firm that pioneered human-centered design thinking approaches

Pixar

Embraces the “brain trust” approach where candid feedback improves ideas

Your Thoughts?

Which of these innovation principles do you find most challenging to implement? Have you seen examples of “thinking different” in your organization?

Cubicles Are The Phone Booths Of The Future

I just read an interesting blog post from Benjamin Bran who says cubicles are the phone booths of the future. I don’t agree with everything he says but in the end I think he is mostly right. Every morning I get up, shower, put on a shirt and tie, take my dog outside, and take my son to daycare the mornings I have him. From daycare (or straight from home) I usually sit in traffic round trip for 40 to 60 minutes a day. Don’t get me wrong I try to make the most of the time I am in the car by listening to podcasts but I’m still not as productive as I could be.

The days I work from home I get so much more accomplished. I work on a campus of over a thousand people and interestingly only need to meet with .001% of any of them on a given day. Of the people I see I could just as easily talk or video conference with them when necessary.

I’d much rather work on a Linux system and could probably do everything I need on my home machine. I’m more than happy to buy my own coffee, heat and A/C, electricity, broadband, computer, uniform (t-shirt and jeans) and more when I’m able to work from home. I also think working from home can have its drawbacks if you are not careful. If telecommuting is not properly managed I’m sure it could turn into a nightmare but for the most part I think it is inevitable in the very near future. What do you think?

Creative Barcodes

Creative Japanese Barcodes

Where Functionality Meets Art

Creative Japanese Barcodes

Creative barcode designs from Japan Source: The Dieline

Anyone who knows me knows that I am fascinated with barcodes. I’ve had some ideas in the past; some for what I do for a living and some for personal business ventures. Barcodes are amazingly powerful yet very simplistic. Evidently a design agency in Japan is doing some interesting things with tweaking the design of their barcodes which I loved.

The Evolution of Barcodes

Since their creation in the 1970s, barcodes have become ubiquitous in retail and inventory management. The standard barcode (UPC – Universal Product Code) was designed purely for functionality, with aesthetics as an afterthought.

However, as products compete for attention on crowded shelves, innovative designers—particularly in Japan—have begun reimagining barcodes as an opportunity for creative expression rather than just a necessary technical element.

Traditional barcodes focus on function over form

The Japanese Creative Approach

Japanese designers have led the way in transforming the humble barcode into a canvas for artistic expression. The designs shown in the featured image demonstrate how creative thinking can turn a utilitarian element into something that enhances brand identity and customer experience.

Nature-Inspired

Barcodes transformed into trees, leaves, and natural landscapes

Cityscapes

Urban skylines integrated into functional scanning codes

Product Integration

Barcodes that visually represent the product they identify

What makes these designs particularly impressive is that they maintain full functionality while adding visual interest. The bar patterns must still be readable by standard scanners, requiring designers to work within strict technical constraints.

The Science Behind the Art

Technical Constraints

  • Must maintain specific height-to-width ratios
  • Requires precise spacing between bars
  • Needs adequate contrast for scanner recognition

Creative Possibilities

  • Extending lines beyond the required height
  • Adding visual elements around the code
  • Integrating the code into thematic illustrations

Business Applications

Creative barcodes offer several advantages for brands:

Enhanced Brand Experience

Turns a mundane technical element into a memorable brand touchpoint

Packaging Differentiation

Sets products apart in competitive retail environments

Design Cohesion

Integrates necessary technical elements with overall packaging design

Your Thoughts?

Have you noticed creative barcode designs on products you’ve purchased? What other utilitarian elements of packaging or products do you think could benefit from more artistic approaches?