Survivor Strategy in Business: Outwit, Outplay, Outlast

🤖 This article was generated using OpenAI’s deep research.

How the strategic principles of a reality TV show mirror successful business practices

The reality TV show Survivor is often described as a social experiment in strategy and human behavior. Stranded contestants must “outwit, outplay, outlast” each other for 39 days to win – a process that mirrors challenges in the business world. In both arenas, individuals navigate limited resources, intense competition, and the need to adapt under pressure.

Many strategic principles that lead to success on Survivor – leadership, adaptability, alliances, risk management, and resilience – have clear analogues in company and professional cultures. Below, we analyze each of these parallels with examples from Survivor and real-world business case studies, supported by psychological insights and research.

Leadership: Balancing Task and Relationship

Survivor Lesson

On Survivor, those who jump into a leadership role without building relationships often become early targets. A classic pattern is that a self-appointed “project manager” works feverishly to build shelter or gather food while neglecting social bonds – and ironically gets voted off first.

In one analysis of the show, hard-working tribe members focusing only on tasks were eliminated before the “slackers” who spent time chatting and bonding. The reason is simple: the social leaders on the beach were actually forging trust and alliances, which protected them from being voted out.

This underscores that effective leadership requires more than directive authority; it demands emotional intelligence and team-building. Research in group dynamics supports this: great leaders achieve goals and maintain relationships – “tasks and relationships are both essential in leadership.”

Business Parallel

In business culture, the same lesson applies. A manager solely focused on metrics and deadlines, without fostering trust or empathy, can alienate their team. Companies with high-performing cultures emphasize both performance and people.

Case Study: Microsoft’s Cultural Transformation

Microsoft’s CEO Satya Nadella famously shifted the company from a combative, internal competition mindset to a collaborative “learn-it-all” culture, encouraging growth and empathy over ego. That cultural turnaround, driven by leadership style, has been credited with revitalizing Microsoft’s innovation and morale.

Just as on Survivor a tribe’s morale and unity can determine its success in challenges, in organizations a leader who builds a supportive, values-driven culture will see better engagement and loyalty.

The takeaway: whether guiding a tribe or a corporate team, leadership is an exercise in influence and inclusion – aligning people toward a goal while making each member feel safe and valued.

Adaptability: Navigating Change and Uncertainty

Survivor Lesson

Adaptability is perhaps the most celebrated trait on Survivor. The host Jeff Probst introduced the very first season by telling contestants they “must learn to adapt or they’ll be voted off.”

Indeed, every episode brings new twists – a sudden tribe swap, a hidden immunity idol in play, an unexpected rule change – and the players who thrive are those who can pivot their strategy on a dime. For instance, if a dominant alliance collapses or a trusted ally is blindsided, a savvy contestant will quickly recalibrate, form new partnerships, or shift game plans to stay alive.

Winners often highlight their flexibility; as one Survivor motto goes, “plan long-term, but be ready to change plans overnight.” The Survivor format forces a balance between having a strategy and staying agile in execution.

Business Parallel

The business world is no less unforgiving to those who fail to adapt. In an era of rapid market disruption, companies must continuously evolve or risk obsolescence.

Case Study: Netflix vs. Blockbuster

A prime example is Netflix’s transformation from a DVD-by-mail service to a streaming powerhouse. When technology and consumer preferences shifted, Netflix embraced the change – investing in streaming technology early, revamping its business model, and even later producing original content. This organizational agility allowed Netflix to dominate an industry that once toppled Blockbuster. As one case study notes, Netflix “continuously adapt[ed] to market changes,” setting a benchmark for digital transformation.

In contrast, companies that failed to adapt – like Kodak, which stuck with film in the face of digital photography – illustrate how inflexibility can be fatal.

Adaptability is also a key component of resilience research. Business scholars define resilience as an organization’s “timely adaptation to both immediate and gradual changes in the business environment.”

The strategic parallel is clear: adapt or perish is the rule in both Survivor and business.

Alliances and Team Dynamics: The Power of Trust

Survivor Lesson

In Survivor, no one wins alone. From the outset, contestants scramble to form alliances – small teams whose members agree to protect each other and vote together. A strong alliance provides safety in numbers: if you have the majority on your side, you control the vote and can eliminate outsiders.

Example: Boston Rob’s Alliance Management

In Survivor: Redemption Island, Boston Rob Mariano forged an alliance and famously forbade its members from even talking one-on-one with those outside the group – an extreme but effective way to build loyalty by treating everyone else as a common enemy. His tight-knit alliance, bound by trust and a clear vision, carried him to victory.

More generally, alliances in Survivor are maintained by constant communication and reassurance; players “check in” with allies to quell paranoia and keep everyone on the same page. When alliances break, it’s often due to a loss of trust or someone seizing an opportunity to get ahead (the well-timed betrayal).

Thus, Survivor illustrates both the value of collaboration and the fragility of partnerships in a competitive environment.

Business Parallel

Professional cultures likewise hinge on the power of alliances – both internal teams and external partnerships. Within organizations, high-performing teams resemble Survivor alliances in their trust and mutual commitment.

Colleagues who build genuine relationships and have each other’s backs create a supportive culture that can weather challenges. Leaders are advised to cultivate this trust by being transparent and “checking in” regularly with team members (much as Survivor allies do), which leads to better loyalty and performance.

Case Study: Uber and Spotify Alliance

Externally, companies form strategic alliances to undertake projects that each party couldn’t accomplish alone. A textbook example is the partnership between Uber and Spotify: Uber wanted to improve riders’ experience with music, and Spotify had the streaming technology. By teaming up, Uber provided the user base and Spotify the tech, creating a mutually beneficial service neither could have built alone.

In business, as in Survivor, the strongest alliances are those where both parties benefit and share common goals.

However, there’s also a parallel in knowing when to re-evaluate alliances. Just as a Survivor player might decide to “flip” on an alliance that no longer serves their path to the end, companies must periodically assess their partnerships and team dynamics.

The key is that whether you’re on a tropical island or in a boardroom, relationships built on trust, open communication, and aligned interests are a cornerstone of survival and success.

Risk Management: Balancing Bold Moves and Caution

Survivor Lesson

Every move in Survivor is a risk calculation. Should I vote off a strong ally before he turns on me? Should I play my hidden immunity idol now or save it? Bold, risky moves can yield big rewards (such as blindsiding a major threat), but they can also backfire spectacularly.

Conversely, playing too cautiously can be a slow death sentence – if you never take initiative, you may end up carried to the end with no resume, only to lose the final jury vote.

As one entrepreneur observed, “Survivor is all about taking risks — forming alliances, hunting for immunity idols, and deciding when to play them.” The winners tend to be those who take calculated risks at the right time.

For instance, a contestant might risk angering someone by flipping alliances in order to break up a rival power bloc, calculating that the long-term benefit outweighs the immediate fallout.

On the other hand, a notorious example of poor risk management on Survivor is overplaying: contestants who made one move too many (a premature blindside or a needless gamble) often found themselves voted out once they burned trust.

Thus, successful players treat risk like a resource to be managed – they neither shy away from it nor gamble aimlessly, but rather weigh the odds and potential payoff of each decision.

Business Parallel

Entrepreneurs and businesses face a similar tightrope. Pursuing innovation or growth invariably involves risk, but failing to take risks can mean stagnation. As Facebook’s founder learned early on, “in a world that’s changing so quickly, the biggest risk you can take is not taking any risk.”

In corporate strategy, this translates to a need for bold vision. Companies that never venture beyond their comfort zone – sticking only to legacy products or markets – may survive in the short term but eventually lose out to more daring competitors.

Yet, uncalculated risk is just as dangerous in business as it is in Survivor. That’s why modern enterprises emphasize risk management: identifying potential threats and opportunities, analyzing them, and making informed decisions.

Case Study: Amazon’s AWS Gamble

When Amazon decided to launch Amazon Web Services (AWS), it was a significant risk – entering a new industry (cloud computing) far from its core online retail business. Many questioned the move, but it was a calculated risk based on the growing need for cloud infrastructure. That bold bet became one of Amazon’s biggest growth drivers.

In contrast, think of a company like Kodak, which famously avoided the risk of pivoting to digital photography (despite inventing one of the first digital cameras) for fear of cannibalizing its film business. That reluctance to take a necessary risk proved fatal when digital tech left Kodak behind.

The optimal approach in both contexts is strategic risk management – know when to stick with the safe choice and when to strike out boldly.

Resilience: Outlasting and Bouncing Back

Survivor Lesson

Survivor is as much a mental and physical endurance test as it is a strategy game. Contestants are subjected to hunger, fatigue, and the stress of social conflict. The ability to persevere through hardships – to stay focused and positive after nights of rain on a bamboo shelter or after being blindsided by allies – is often what separates the winner from those who quit or implode.

In psychological terms, Survivor demands resilience and grit. Research on high achievers has found that grit (passion and perseverance) and resilience (adaptability to change) are key predictors of success.

Example: Chris’s Comeback

A famous example is in Survivor: Edge of Extinction, where a contestant voted out on Day 8 (Chris) refused to give up, endured on a punitive exile island, earned his way back in on Day 35, and ultimately won the game. His journey epitomized resilience – the capacity to bounce back from failure and still triumph.

Even in regular seasons, many winners face moments of adversity (like losing allies or facing a minority position) but find ways to regroup and push forward. This quality of mental toughness and flexibility under pressure is highly prized; as the saying goes, Survivor isn’t just about outwitting and outplaying, but also outlasting.

Business Parallel

In the business world, resilience is equally vital. Companies encounter crises, disruptions, and failures regularly – from economic recessions to supply chain breakdowns to global pandemics.

Organizational resilience refers to a company’s ability to absorb the shock, recover, and even come out stronger. A useful definition is “the ability of an organization to anticipate, prepare for, respond to, and recover from adverse events… it’s about adaptability and the strength to bounce back.”

Case Study: Pandemic Adaptations

Companies that had prepared contingency plans and adaptive processes proved far more resilient during events like the COVID-19 pandemic than those that were caught off guard. For example, many restaurants and retailers that quickly pivoted to online ordering, curbside pickup, or other creative solutions in 2020 managed to survive or thrive, whereas others that couldn’t adapt had to shut doors.

Resilient organizations typically foster a culture of learning and flexibility – they treat setbacks as learning opportunities and encourage problem-solving at all levels. This parallels Survivor’s resilient players who treat getting blindsided not as game over but as a wake-up call to adjust their play.

In sum, resilience in business means creating a company that can outlast hardships, much as the Sole Survivor is the one who withstood everything thrown at them.

Conclusion: Outwitting, Outplaying, Outlasting in Business

Though Survivor is a televised game and business is real life, the strategic parallels are striking. Both domains involve people working together (and at times against each other) under pressure, requiring a mix of savvy strategy and social finesse.

Key Strategic Parallels:

  • Leadership: Culture and relationships can trump raw efficiency – a lesson every manager should heed in building team cohesion.
  • Adaptability: Markets and workplaces, like the game’s twists, change rapidly, favoring those who pivot rather than cling to old plans.
  • Alliances: Trust and collaboration are powerful assets, whether you’re forging a voting bloc on an island or a cross-functional team in an office.
  • Risk Management: Both contexts call for courage balanced by caution – the wisdom to take bold action when warranted, but always with a calculated understanding of consequences.
  • Resilience: The endurance to withstand setbacks and come back stronger is essential in both arenas.

Professional and company cultures can draw direct inspiration from Survivor. For instance, promoting open communication and trust in a company mirrors the ally-building on Survivor that keeps tribes strong. Encouraging a mindset that treats challenges as opportunities to innovate is akin to the Survivor mentality of adapting to any twist.

Even the endgame of Survivor – persuading a jury of peers to reward you – has a business parallel in maintaining one’s reputation and integrity; ultimately, success is decided by people’s trust and perception of you.

By examining Survivor through a strategic lens, we see a microcosm of competitive strategy and team psychology. It reinforces lessons backed by management science and psychology research, but in a visceral, entertaining way.

As one business writer noted, the skills and traits that win Survivor are “crucial in the business world” – a testament to how art can imitate life. In both Survivor and business, those who lead wisely, adapt quickly, cultivate allies, manage risk, and demonstrate resilience are the ones most likely to thrive.

Sources

Leadership Sources

Adaptability Sources

Alliances & Team Dynamics Sources

Risk Management Sources

Resilience Sources

The Best Ideas Die in the Shower

The Best Ideas Die in the Shower - Masters of Scale

On this episode of Masters of Scale, Linda Rottenberg talks about how the best ideas originate in the shower, but too often they never escape the bathroom.

Key Insights

Ideas Need Action

Even brilliant ideas remain worthless until they’re put into action and shared with the world.

Overcoming Hesitation

The journey from idea to execution often requires overcoming fear and self-doubt.

Entrepreneurial Mindset

Successful entrepreneurs develop systems to capture and implement their creative insights.

About Masters of Scale

Masters of Scale is a podcast hosted by Reid Hoffman, co-founder of LinkedIn, where he explores how successful companies grow from zero to a gazillion. Each episode features conversations with pioneering founders and leaders who share their insights on innovation, leadership, and scaling businesses.

About Linda Rottenberg

Linda Rottenberg is the co-founder and CEO of Endeavor, a nonprofit organization that supports high-impact entrepreneurs around the world. Known as “La Chica Loca” (the crazy girl) for her innovative approaches to entrepreneurship, she has been named one of “America’s Best Leaders” by U.S. News and one of TIME’s 100 “Innovators for the 21st Century.”

Her book, “Crazy Is a Compliment: The Power of Zigging When Everyone Else Zags,” provides insights on how entrepreneurs can break barriers and achieve success.

Linda Rottenberg

Your Thoughts?

What great ideas have you had that never made it out of the “shower”? What holds you back from pursuing them?

Outrunning Money

“Honey, you have to stop chasing money because money runs really fast. You should go do the right thing. It will chase you.”

— Advice from Tariq Farid’s mother to the Edible Arrangements CEO

In this NPR interview, Tariq Farid shares the story of how he transformed a small flower shop into the global phenomenon that is Edible Arrangements. At the heart of his success lies this simple wisdom from his mother—a reminder that authentic purpose often leads to prosperity.

The interview explores Farid’s immigrant journey from Pakistan to America, how he built a business now worth hundreds of millions of dollars, and how his mother’s practical wisdom guided his entrepreneurial decisions at crucial moments.

TOMS: Blake Mycoskie

How a Trip to Argentina Sparked a Business Revolution

The story of Blake Mycoskie and the “One for One” model that changed social entrepreneurship

Blake Mycoskie had already founded and sold four successful businesses before his 30th birthday—a remarkable achievement by any standard. But it was a chance trip to Argentina in 2006 that would transform his approach to business forever.

While traveling through rural communities, Mycoskie witnessed children without shoes facing not just discomfort, but serious health and education barriers. After observing a local shoe drive, he had a revolutionary insight: rather than creating a charity that would constantly need fundraising, what if he built a sustainable business model where every purchase guaranteed help for someone in need?

This simple idea became TOMS Shoes—a company that pioneered the “One for One” business model. For every pair of shoes purchased, TOMS would give a pair to a child in need. The model proved that businesses could be both profitable and philanthropic by design, not just as an afterthought.

The TOMS Impact:

  • Over 100 million pairs of shoes given to children in need
  • Expanded to provide eyewear, clean water, and safe birth services
  • Inspired dozens of companies to adopt similar social impact models
  • Demonstrated that consumers will support businesses with authentic social missions

Dummy-Proofing

People tend to think that they need a process for everything, and once in a while you hear ‘We’re going to dummy-proof it.’ But if you dummy-proof the process, you only get dummies to work there. That’s why we’re so opposed to that and focused on giving people great freedom. They’ll make mistakes, of course, but you’ll get a lot of great ideas.

Reed Hastings
Co-founder and former CEO, Netflix

The Netflix Culture of Freedom and Responsibility

This quote perfectly encapsulates Netflix’s famous corporate culture, which rejects excessive rules in favor of hiring exceptional people and giving them extraordinary freedom. While most companies respond to growth by adding processes and controls, Netflix deliberately does the opposite.

The company’s groundbreaking “Culture Deck” — a 125-slide presentation that has been viewed more than 20 million times — outlines this philosophy in detail. Facebook COO Sheryl Sandberg once called it “perhaps the most important document ever to come out of Silicon Valley.”

Hastings believes that as companies grow, they tend to become increasingly complex and restrictive, ultimately stifling innovation. Netflix’s alternative approach champions:

  • Context over control — Leaders provide clear context about goals and challenges rather than trying to control exactly how work gets done
  • High talent density — Paying top market compensation to attract and retain the very best people
  • Radical candor — Direct and honest feedback at all levels of the organization
  • “Freedom and responsibility” — The core philosophy that guides decision-making throughout the company

This approach has helped Netflix transform from a DVD-by-mail service to one of the world’s leading entertainment companies, demonstrating that sometimes the best process is having less process.

Company Culture

Key Insights from “The Year Without Pants”

Leadership Lessons from WordPress.com and the Future of Work

In “The Year Without Pants,” Scott Berkun shares his experience working as a team leader at Automattic, the company behind WordPress.com. The book offers a fascinating glimpse into the culture and practices of one of the world’s most successful fully remote companies.

I’ve collected some of the most impactful passages that resonated with me about company culture, leadership, and organizational design. These insights feel particularly relevant in today’s increasingly remote work environment.

The Automattic Creed

Page 48 | Location 723-30

“Realizing how critical the values he’d learned for WordPress were to the culture he wanted to continue at Automattic, he wrote a creed that would appear on official documents, including in my offer letter: I will never stop learning. I won’t just work on things that are assigned to me. I know there’s no such thing as a status quo. I will build our business sustainably through passionate and loyal customers. I will never pass up an opportunity to help out a colleague, and I’ll remember the days before I knew everything. I am more motivated by impact than money, and I know that Open Source is one of the most powerful ideas of our generation. I will communicate as much as possible because it’s the oxygen of a distributed company. I am in a marathon, not a sprint, and no matter how far away the goal is, the only way to get there is by putting one foot in front of another every day. Given time, there is no problem that’s insurmountable.”

This creed exemplifies how strong values can be codified into organizational culture. Notice how it emphasizes continuous learning, proactive problem-solving, and the importance of communication in remote work.

Culture Flows from the Top

Page 148 | Location 2256-64

“If ever you wonder about why a family or a company is the way it is, always look up first. The culture in any organization is shaped every day by the behavior of the most powerful person in the room. If at your job, people yell at each other often, the reason it happens is that the most powerful person in the room lets it happen. He or she hired the person who’s yelling—and failed to interrupt that person or pull him or her aside for feedback about that behavior. If the powerful person did choose to act, it would stop, even if the choice had to be firing the offender. In every meeting in every organization around the world where bad behavior is happening, there is someone with the most power in the room who can do something about it. What that person does shapes the culture. If the most powerful person is silent, this signals passive acceptance of whatever is going on. And if that person speaks up to say, “Good idea,” or, “Thanks for asking a clarifying question,” everyone notices and will be more likely to do those things.”

A powerful reminder that culture isn’t defined by mission statements but by what behaviors are actually tolerated or celebrated by leadership. What we permit, we promote.

The Danger of Territorial Thinking

Page 194 | Location 2966-73

“Teams create territories. This is a force for good since it helps people focus and feel pride. But it creates problems for projects that fall between teams. If you try to cover everything, the teams are unfocused, and if you cover too little, there’s no room for growth. But even if you carefully design teams, the turf needs to be conceptual, not territorial. Organizations become bureaucratic as soon as people define their job around a specific rule, or feature, rather than a goal.

For example, if you tell me my job is to cook the french fries, I will resist anything that threatens the existence of french fries, since when they go away, so does my job. But if you tell me my job is to make side dishes for customers, I’ll be open to changing from fries to onion rings or other side dishes, even ones we’ve yet to invent, since my identity isn’t tied to a particular side dish but instead to the role side dishes play. Bureaucracies form when people’s jobs are tied strictly to rules and procedures, rather than the effect those things are supposed to have on the world.”

This insight about defining roles around outcomes rather than specific tasks is vital for creating adaptable organizations. When we identify with a specific task rather than the outcome it serves, innovation becomes threatening.

What resonated with you from these passages? Have you seen examples of these principles at work in your own organization?

If you enjoyed these highlights, consider checking out the full book for more insights on modern work culture and leadership in distributed organizations.

Ray Bradbury on Work and Creativity

Illustration of Ray Bradbury
Illustration of Ray Bradbury
By Liftarn (Traced from Image: Ray Douglas Bradbury.jpg)
[Public domain], via Wikimedia Commons

Why is it that in a society with a Puritan heritage, we have such completely ambivalent feelings about Work? We feel guilty, do we not, if not busy? But we feel somewhat soiled, on the other hand, if we sweat overmuch?

I can only suggest that we often indulge in made work, in false business, to keep from being bored. Or worse still, we conceive the idea of working for money. The money becomes the object, the target, the end-all and be-all. Thus work, being important only as a means to that end, degenerates into boredom. Can we wonder then that we hate it so? Nothing could be further from true creativity.

Ray Bradbury

American author (1920-2012)

About Ray Bradbury

Ray Bradbury was an American author and screenwriter known for his works in science fiction, fantasy, and horror. His best-known works include “Fahrenheit 451,” “The Martian Chronicles,” and “Something Wicked This Way Comes.” Throughout his career, Bradbury explored themes of censorship, technology, human nature, and the importance of imagination and creativity.

This quote reflects Bradbury’s belief that true fulfillment comes not from working for external rewards like money or status, but from engaging in creative pursuits that bring intrinsic satisfaction. For Bradbury, meaningful work was inseparable from creativity and passion.

Essential Bradbury Reads:

  • Fahrenheit 451 (1953)
  • The Martian Chronicles (1950)
  • The Illustrated Man (1951)
  • Something Wicked This Way Comes (1962)
  • Dandelion Wine (1957)
  • Zen in the Art of Writing (1990)
What’s your favorite Ray Bradbury quote or work? Share in the comments below.

9 Principles of Innovation at Google by Gopi Kallayil, Google’s Social Chief Evangelist

The 9 Principles of Innovation at Google

Notes from Gopi Kallayil’s Dreamforce presentation

I recently attended a Dreamforce session titled “The 9 Principles of Innovation at Google” and wanted to share my notes.

1 Innovation comes from everywhere

There is no innovation department at Google. Kallayil shared an example where their algorithm was working with unintended consequences in that searches for “best ways to commit suicide” did in fact list what if felt the best results were.

A medical doctor at Google argued persuasively that although the algorithm may have decided to provide results, Google needed to intervene with human-powered result by providing the 800 number to the suicide prevention hotline. If you now Google anything suicide-related you receive the 800 number for the suicide hotline as the top result. The day the change was made the volume of calls to the hotline went up by 9%.

2 Focus on the user and all else will follow

Provided an example of implementing instant search which saves the user a few microseconds. Executives knew receiving faster results would minimize the amount of time ads were displayed but they went ahead and implemented it because it made for a better user experience.

Also mentioned that although each user is only saving a few microseconds, when you factor the billions of searches a year, it saves the world an immense amount of time at scale. Implementing instant search was also more costly to implement but again it was best for user experience and therefore implemented.

3 Think 10x (ten times) better

This is Larry Page’s mantra. If you want radical revolution at a scale, think of things as 10x and not 10%.

Provided the example of Google Books. When Google’s mission was created to “organize the world’s information and make it universally accessible and useful” it wasn’t to just organize digital information. At the time when Google Books was created as a goal, most of the world’s information was primarily still analog.

4 Bet on technical insights

Google engineers developed a self-driving car as an example. A few engineers read that a couple million accidents car accidents happen a year and felt compelled as engineers to see what they could do to reduce or eliminate those deaths.

They thought if you remove the human it could reduce or eliminate the accidents. They already had services like Google Earth and Maps at their disposal.

5 Ship/launch and iterate

Some organizations only ship products when they are polished or fully ready. At Google, they believe they should develop a first prototype, get feedback, and then based on that feedback iterate to make it better.

Examples: Gmail was in beta for 3 years. Fast is better than slow. The first prototype of Google Glass was developed in 90 minutes.

6 Give employees 20 percent time

Give people freedom in their regular schedule, even when outside of the core job, and they will delight you with what they come up with quite often. They actually didn’t come up with the idea, they borrowed it with what some universities do.

The way it works is you quickly build a prototype and you recruit others to help you with that idea inside of the company.

Products Born from 20% Time:

  • Gmail
  • Google News
  • Google Alerts
  • Street View enhancements like the camera trike for narrow alleys
  • Galapagos ocean Street View

7 Default to open

Google admits they can’t hire all the “smart” people in the world. They believe if you open up your application to the world you can allow them to help you make their products even better.

A perfect example is Google Maps. They empower people to help them via Google Map Maker to update the maps because the world’s infrastructure is constantly changing each day.

8 Fail well

“There is a belief in the company that if you don’t fail often enough, you’re not trying hard enough… failure is actually a badge of honor.”

There is no stigma attached to failure at Google. Since Larry Page has taken over he has shut down 72 products so they try many things and shut then shut that service down if it doesn’t end up working.

9 Have a mission that matters

If you ask people at Google why they come into the work many will say that their work is helping to change humanity (the world). They are working to level the playing field for information retrieval.

Key Takeaway

These nine principles have helped Google maintain a culture of innovation even as it has grown into one of the world’s largest companies. Which principle resonates most with you or your organization?

Seth Godin: Easier to Teach Compliance Than Initiative

Seth Godin on Compliance vs. Initiative

The Educational Challenge

Compliance is simple to measure, simple to test for and simple to teach. Punish non-compliance, reward obedience and repeat.

Initiative is very difficult to teach to 28 students in a quiet classroom. It’s difficult to brag about in a school board meeting. And it’s a huge pain in the neck to do reliably.

Schools like teaching compliance. They’re pretty good at it.

To top it off, until recently the customers of a school or training program (the companies that hire workers) were buying compliance by the bushel. Initiative was a red flag, not an asset.

Of course, now that’s all changed. The economy has rewritten the rules, and smart organizations seek out intelligent problem solvers. Everything is different now. Expect the part about how much easier it is to teach compliance.

– Seth Godin

https://seths.blog/

Compliance

  • Simple to measure
  • Simple to test for
  • Simple to teach
  • Rewarded with obedience
  • Previously valued by employers

Initiative

  • Difficult to teach in a classroom
  • Hard to showcase at school boards
  • Challenging to implement reliably
  • Previously seen as a “red flag”
  • Now valued by smart organizations

Food for Thought

How might we redesign education to better nurture initiative while still providing necessary structure?

Join the Conversation

Do you agree with Seth’s assessment? How has your educational experience shaped your ability to take initiative?

Pricing Strategy Insight

⏱️

When you charge by the hour, you and your client begin your relationship with diametrically opposed desires. You want to bill more hours, they want you to bill fewer hours. That is a sucky place to start a relationship.

Jason Blumer

Pricing Strategies for Creatives

Read Full Article

Worth Considering

Alternative Pricing Models

Value-based pricing, fixed project fees, and retainer models can align client and provider interests.

Relationship Focus

Starting relationships with aligned incentives builds trust and encourages collaboration.

Long-term Benefits

When both sides want the same outcome, partnerships become more productive and sustainable.

Your Thoughts?

How do you structure pricing in your business? Have you found alternatives to hourly billing that work better?